Entire

Git forge from former GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke, built for teams where agents write much of the code. Trails replace pull requests: review agents score every push on evals such as security and slop, so you merge when scores are stable and can require human sign-off or CI. Agent sessions and prompts are stored with the commits (open-source MIT CLI for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and others), Continuous Memory lets agents query that history, and repos can be hosted in US, EU, India or Australia regions. Free to use; only agent usage is billed, from prepaid credit, with a one-time $100 trial credit.

Visit Entire ↗

Pricing

Model
usage-based
Starting price
Not listed — check the vendor site
Source
Pricing page ↗

Best for

Get AI code reviews on pull requests

▸ Swaps the PR diff for a dashboard of agent eval scores on every push, so you review where the scores say a human is needed.

Add long-term memory and knowledge to an agent

▸ Keeps every coding-agent session and the reasoning behind each change in the repo, searchable by the next agent session.

Entire alternatives

Other tools we list for the same jobs, closest match first.

CodeRabbit

Independent AI code review, PR triage and change explanations.

freemium, from $24/user/mo

Mem0

Memory layer for AI agents and apps.

freemium, from $19/mo

Greptile

AI code reviews that understand your entire codebase.

paid, from $30/seat/mo

Letta

Platform for stateful agents that remember and learn (from MemGPT).

freemium, from $20/mo

GitHub Copilot

GitHub's AI pair programmer with chat, agent mode and a cloud coding agent.

freemium

Pinecone

Managed vector database and AI knowledge platform.

freemium

Related use cases

Delegate tickets to an autonomous coding agentCode faster with an AI-powered editorBuild a landing page without codingBuild a full-stack web app from a prompt